logoalt Hacker News

charcircuityesterday at 6:43 PM6 repliesview on HN

Your post literally suggests that a customer spontaneously should kiss the employee. That kind of behavior is goes far beyond an innocent facade of "free hugs."


Replies

donkersyesterday at 7:05 PM

Consent is involved, everyone is a volunteer and willing participant. If you don’t want a hug or kiss or whatever you don’t get one. I fail to understand how this makes it anything but “free hugs”

helloplanetsyesterday at 7:04 PM

Doesn't the post read that it's the server who would give you the kiss, if you compliment them three times?

Also, volunteer is not the same as employee. Especially important in this context.

show 1 reply
stousetyesterday at 8:58 PM

Are you somehow operating under the impression that volunteers are being held against their will and forced to give and/or receive free kisses to anyone who demands it?

Are you okay?

show 1 reply
bsimpsonyesterday at 7:47 PM

Something's either literally stated or suggested. It can't be both, but it can be neither.

jamwilyesterday at 8:55 PM

What is wrong with you. This isn’t a customer/employee thing at all. That’s, like, the entire point of Burning Man.

show 1 reply
xmcp123yesterday at 8:31 PM

...you ask. Just like you would for the spanking.