> I'm not defending the company at all. My comment was about the YouTuber who got involved as a 3rd party for content production.

You have claimed the story is "just needless YouTube drama" and that you "wouldn't really trust the YouTube influencers for the whole story".

Unless you are completely incapable of understanding basic human communication, this obviously amounts to defending the company.

> That account is reminding me why I switched to using an anonymous handle on HN, though.

Because you can't ever admit being wrong?

You’ve posted EIGHT comments defending this company with what ifs.

ONE comment admitting you haven’t actually got any understanding of the facts.

If you were genuinely trying to get to the bottom of it every single comment wouldn’t be defending the thieves.

Are you Mormon too?