logoalt Hacker News

stingraycharlestoday at 4:09 AM1 replyview on HN

Isn’t another aspect of it that it’s sufficiently random / unrecognizable, for example?

I’m very much aware of the differences between symmetric and asymmetric encryption, and realize that symmetric encryption is much simpler, but I figure that if there are weaknesses to be found in algorithms such as md5, then surely there are also potential weaknesses in symmetric encryption algorithms?

Now I’m not saying that this would be the case for battle tested algorithms like AES. But is there any particular reason why this whole category could not possibly have weaknesses?


Replies

tptacektoday at 4:23 AM

You can certainly invent a weak block cipher, and an LLM would probably do a decent job spotting e.g. something that could be productively attacked with a SAT solver.