logoalt Hacker News

user-today at 2:29 AM4 repliesview on HN

for the non bikers, to help us understand, whats wrong with it?


Replies

ctiddtoday at 4:25 AM

This is an inherently inefficient design, where that inefficiency means increased 1) battery use and 2) tire wear.

From a cyclist’s perspective, this is fundamentally a stopgap product for “curious” customers dipping their toes into e-bikes. I don’t say that necessarily to criticize it. There’s a place for a product that someone can put on any old bike and see if they want to buy a more expensive long-term solution. But that doesn’t make it a product I’d recommend.

The tire wear problem is significant enough that there are heat resistant tires specifically for this type of drum application (designed for old-style indoor trainers, not for use on the road), because use on a drum will cause premature wear for normal road tires.

show 1 reply
loegtoday at 3:32 AM

Destroys tires, very limited range/power due to poor power delivery from motor to tire. Parasitic drag when coasting or battery is dead.

NegativeLatencytoday at 2:35 AM

Limited power delivery, horrible in the rain, prevents using fenders

show 2 replies
UqWBcuFx6NV4rtoday at 2:32 AM

They aren’t reliable or efficient.