logoalt Hacker News

defrosttoday at 6:11 AM1 replyview on HN

The difference being that it cost a lot more to destroy those two Japanese cities alone than it did in total to destroy 72 other Japanese cities to the same degree.

Later on, that type of weapon became cheaper and several thousands were created and became the basis for a long window of relative peace.


Replies

stavrostoday at 8:06 AM

Strictly speaking, the first city cost a whole lot of money, the second was basically free, through the magic of not amortizing the cost of R&D to win an online argument.

show 2 replies