In which I expound on a very petty complaint about fictional wormholes.
If you’re inclined to add any more, consider Outer Wilds! “Black holes technology” is a major plot point and shows up as a neat gameplay mechanic in a couple places.
Scott Manley has a couple of nice videos about wormholes:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V7e-1bRpweo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PVO8nvb1o2w
The second video is about how the first video was made.
> Schlock Mercenary [...] Gold star, A+, would archive binge again.
Seconded, and don't worry, the initial art gets a lot better over the decades. :)
Nothing requires the wormhole "surface" to be a sphere, just like nothing requires the wormhole in the 2D analogy to be a circular hole. If you make it a sphere with one flat side, travelers won't have to traverse curved space (with the attendant weird tidal/gravitational effects).
PSA: This was posted 4 days ago and seems to have been given a "second chance", so take all the HN timestamps with a grain of salt.
Doctor Who's Time Vortex is not a wormhole...
How does a 2D creature see curved space? https://youtu.be/9JbYDDjhnx4
Unsure where to safely step forward. The bending boundary bits look terrifying.
I thought stargates were explicitly not wormholes. For one thing, they're one-way.
We never see the wormhole in Stargate, at least under SG1 canon. It's microscopic and simply used for transporting a matter stream. The ring field is a matter destabalizer and recombinator, pretty much the same thing as Star Trek transporters. Thats why radio waves can move two-way but matter is one-way.
Now if you're using Movie canon, yeah, it's broke.
Also, Marvel? Those aren't wormholes, they're magic portals.