logoalt Hacker News

skew-aberrationyesterday at 4:53 AM3 repliesview on HN

Yes, but public transit does create value - the question is who captures it.

BART likely created huge profits for people who owned land in the areas it services - house prices and rents would have increased substantially. Public investment, private profits. Subsidies in the form of low-cost fares like this are just further welfare for the landowners.

Interestingly, about a third of BART's cost was acquiring land - if/when that same land is cleared and sold on market, the project would have operated at an enormous profit. Certainly, BART's current assets would far exceed 'total fares collected'.


Replies

idbnstrayesterday at 4:46 PM

this is a great example of why we need to shift to land value / Georgist taxes everywhere

wallst07yesterday at 11:46 AM

>BART likely created huge profits for people who owned land in the areas it services

Unless you try to build housing.

https://reason.com/2018/02/21/san-francisco-man-has-spent-4-...

xnxyesterday at 11:08 AM

> public transit does create value - the question is who captures it.

Overpaid transit employees, engineering firms, and construction companies.

show 1 reply