alt Hacker News> but also presenting them with "enjoyable proofs". > Or maybe _these_ mathematicians are afraid that _other_ mathematicians will do it. Just elitism and gate keeping.
Ok, I don't see the point of discussing with you. It's clear that you decided what to believe in and no evidence will convince you that reality is more complex. The proof is that you ignored all the nuances expressed here by simply sticking to your simplistic interpretation, without any explanation of why such nuances are invalid.
Replies
simianwords • yesterday at 10:54 AM
Whats the nuance here? Your post implied that the problem was unreadable proof and we are saying that this is not central to the discussion. Unreadable proofs are actually very very irrelevant to this whole drama
➕ show 1 reply
You know what would be a great reaction from the so called "community" ?
Hey! It is really nice that you have dropped solution for so many open problems. We appreciate it and would like to see more. However, can you please work on the output writing/explanation quality? It is hard to read and understand. We would be happy to independently validate these but current paper quality leaves much to be desired.
That's it. This would make paper quality an important target for next generation models.
If problem was unreadable proofs, that would have been the reaction. But that's not what we are seeing :)
FWIW, in many online platforms, many actual mathematicians who referee papers, have said the quality of the papers are not outstanding, but they are still better than average.