logoalt Hacker News

jlmorton • today at 9:58 AM • 6 replies • view on HN

In retrospect, having 100 trusted certificate authorities might have been excessive.


Replies

tclancy • today at 10:16 AM

In retrospect, not having a tiny competency check may have been an oversight.

➕ show 2 replies
Scott_Helme_ • today at 1:50 PM

That really depends how you define "trusted certificate authorities".

If you're talking about root certs then it's almost 350 currently trusted by at least one major operator.

If you include intermediates, you're talking more than 3,600!

londons_explore • today at 4:24 PM

Certificate transparency requirements effectively take the power away from certificate authorities.

They instead place the burden on individual webmasters again to actually verify that nobody has been falsely issuing for their domains. There are also some new vulnerabilities about CT logs who might be malicious.

➕ show 1 reply
m3kw9 • today at 1:10 PM

How are they trusted if they can just generate any key they like in their back room?

➕ show 3 replies
otabdeveloper4 • today at 10:57 AM

Correct, we only need zero.

➕ show 1 reply
BirAdam • today at 10:54 AM

or, perhaps you need more so that one being stupid doesn't effect so much.

➕ show 2 replies