logoalt Hacker News

US Government is hiding a secret court ruling about how it spies on Americans

921 points • by helterskelter2 • yesterday at 2:06 PM • 333 comments • view on HN

Comments

edot • yesterday at 2:41 PM

"Wyden has also warned about a classified interpretation of Section 702 that he says multiple administrations have relied on and refused to declassify. “When it is eventually declassified,” he said in March, “the American people are going to be stunned that it took so long and that Congress had been debating this authority with insufficient information.”"

Spying on American citizens is a bipartisan point of agreement.

➕ show 8 replies
TheCoelacanth • yesterday at 2:32 PM

Secret courts are anathema to democracy and need to be abolished.

➕ show 7 replies
V__ • yesterday at 3:23 PM

I will always be baffled by the dichotomy of "the US has the most freedom" and "no democratic country spies more on its citizens".

➕ show 13 replies
silverFork • yesterday at 3:26 PM

How it is done, everybody knows how.. backdoors in servers, back door in communication equipment, decryption method for of all that goes through fiber in entire world.. Massive data storage to store everything. How is not an issue; every node and communication, hardware and software has a backdoor.

Do they have the right to tap into world communication as well as their own is the issue? They are not challenged by apposing parties and their own population or people have given up.

Perhaps there will be a disaster is waiting with all these backdoors and Ai supremacy.

➕ show 1 reply
giancarlostoro • yesterday at 7:01 PM

Isn't that what all the hype about National Security Letters (and related events from those years) were all about? I never thought any of that went away, the media just stopped reporting on it. We had Lavabit and Snowden showing us how unhinged these things can get.

➕ show 1 reply
ARandomerDude • yesterday at 3:08 PM

The debate about reapproval of section 702 is all theater. Does anyone genuinely believe the government would stop surveilling us if the authorization expired?

➕ show 3 replies
advisedwang • yesterday at 3:17 PM

They don't want the public to see the big green "APPROVED" rubber stamp that the FISC uses.

darksaints • yesterday at 3:39 PM

I'm increasingly of the opinion that state secret classification of our law enforcement systems should only exist for a year max. We've abused the system to shield evil people from accountability and to hide evil actions by our government, and that has to change.

watersb • today at 1:39 AM

FISA court is an insane post-9/11 secret tribunal, a bad idea for these past 25 years.

But at least they were subject to Congressional oversight.

> the Trump administration is illegally withholding a secret court’s findings from Congress

Oops.

matthewmcg • yesterday at 3:24 PM

He should go further and describe or read these secret rulings on the Senate floor, where the speech and debate clause protects him.

➕ show 2 replies
crmd • yesterday at 3:33 PM

This capability virtually guarantees that the next generation of Nelson Mandellas, Julian Assanges, <insert national activist of your choice>, etc. gets nipped in the bud long before they become an actual headache to the ruling class. This is why the owners of every country come together to support these technologies, without exception and regardless of political coalition membership.

➕ show 3 replies
sharts • yesterday at 3:11 PM

This kind of thing will never stop. And those who control it have all the leverage and power.

Perhaps all the spying data should just be publicly accessible and easily accessible for all to use and abuse.

Would democratizing it all so there is never an expectation of privacy from the public vs a select few in power be better in the long run?

➕ show 2 replies
computerex • today at 3:37 AM

This is why I laugh at the face of anyone demonising china and on the moral high horse. At least the Chinese government doesn’t lie about their surveillance. It’s far more insidious what the American government does, it just outright lies and indoctrinates its citizens.

jaekwon • today at 4:10 AM

they are doing much more than reading private messages in real time; they are also manipulating, distorting, delaying, etc based on the content; even going so far as to muck with your local programs (such as VPN) to throttle internet connectivity so that the most sensitive information cannot propagate virally as it should.

The AI matrix prison is real and discussions about it are censored.

mock-possum • yesterday at 3:41 PM

So grateful to have Wyden in my corner. Especially for the last decade or so it sparks joy to fill his bubble in on the ballot.

➕ show 1 reply
tokai • yesterday at 3:08 PM

This headline has been relevant since 2001.

➕ show 1 reply
anigbrowl • yesterday at 6:11 PM

Secret methods are an unavoidable necessity of governance. Secret laws an legal decisions are the hallmark of a failed polity.

tyrabound • yesterday at 10:53 PM

What else could have been expected when this fake imitation America started creating the FISA courts and created the treasonous 5-eyes network of circumventing the Constitution like traitors do.

knorker • yesterday at 8:30 PM

"Secret court ruling" — Land of the free, home of the brave

trimethylpurine • yesterday at 4:05 PM

A ruling belongs to the judicial branch.

jeffbee • yesterday at 3:55 PM

The article could have been interesting but by fundamentally misrepresenting the structure of the American federal government they made it impossible to take seriously.

wormius • yesterday at 6:45 PM

I had a dream last night that the government had a database that corps sent in "opt-out" info from people. Anytime someone opted out of a surveillance system (e.g. ad tracking, etc...) that info got sent to the government as a signal that the person is sus. They took the "if you have nothing to hide" logic to its full conclusion.

The only good thing is that at least under capitalism (not a system I'm a fan of) this is difficult to do (well as long as the owners of said companies weren't sheep), and like most conspiracies is very hard to enforce, there would be a leakage in a program so broad as this.

But it was a disturbing concept. Merely by signalling you didn't want to be watched made you more watched.

➕ show 2 replies
motohagiography • yesterday at 4:29 PM

what was always remarkable about surveillance is that given these immense intrusive powers and a total panopticon, this is still the best they can do.

fentanyl epidemic, mass illegal migration and trafficking, networks of terrible abuse, flagrant public corruption, infiltration of schools and academia, conspiracies to demolish the entire western world, and yet even with total information awareness or some variant, these crimes occur in the open.

the scandal isnt that they are spying, its what they have explicitly chooseb to allow and enable.

➕ show 2 replies
baggachipz • yesterday at 3:17 PM

> The Trump administration has until November 6 to answer the senators.

How convenient that this is right after the midterm elections. If they maintain control, the republicans can simply decide to ignore this requirement without penalty.

➕ show 1 reply
shevy-java • yesterday at 7:22 PM

Trump is going to lose. People are tired of his lies.

➕ show 1 reply
brittbarton • yesterday at 6:26 PM

[flagged]

gsk22 • yesterday at 10:02 PM

[dead]