logoalt Hacker News

JaggerJo • yesterday at 4:37 PM • 6 replies • view on HN

I wish they would make big displays again. Like 32” big 6K.

24” or even 27” feels like such a downgrade.

Also please make the iMacs usable as external monitors agains. Would buy one as a “livingroom computer” instantly if it was also possible to occasionally use it as a docking station for an air..


Replies

bytesmith • yesterday at 5:02 PM

I've been using a new program called RetinaRelay[0] to use my 5k iMac as a second display for my M1 Macbook using an ethernet (or Thunderbolt for even better performance). Works brilliantly. It's definitely higher latency than a normal monitor (my ethernet connection is 45ms vs 5ms for a monitor) but it's not noticeable for coding and miles better than remote desktop or similar.

[0] https://www.retinarelay.com/

➕ show 1 reply
drnick1 • yesterday at 5:23 PM

I think you will find that 4K is generally sufficient at 32". Text is sharp enough, and a high refresh rate is probably more important at that point. There is also the issue that not even a 5090 can push enough fps at resolutions higher than 4K in demanding games.

➕ show 4 replies
phil-pickering • yesterday at 5:02 PM

Apple have never released a 32" version of the iMac; even the iMac Pro was only available as a 27" model.

MadrasTh0rn • yesterday at 4:46 PM

Completely agree.

iPad docking station too

meerita • yesterday at 4:44 PM

To me, it doesn't make sense, I would go a Mac Studio with multiple screens instead a big 32, but some people love working with one monitor.

➕ show 1 reply
Forgeties79 • yesterday at 4:42 PM

I’m still angry that they deprecated target display mode. For a company that talks so much about recycling it’s really messed up they don’t support it. Such an amazing way to give life to old but incredible monitors - you’d have to spend $1000+ to get anything remotely resembling the quality of that display. You can’t even use ones that previously supported it on current Mac’s.

➕ show 5 replies