logoalt Hacker News

charm137 • today at 7:18 PM • 3 replies • view on HN

My somewhat uninformed guess is that the weights of the target network (Qwen or Gemma), when they reach the context of the larger editor model (Astra), the attention process is doing some sort of PCA on the weights, conditional on the prompt ("make this better at games"), fetching the relevant weights from its own network (which serves as the larger database), transforming it into whatever latent space the target model is amenable to and pasting them. If this is the right intuition, it is amazing what attention is able to achieve. As a test, I think smaller networks won't be able to make big ones better using the same process.

EDIT: I think the bigger implication is that backprop is not the only game in town.


Replies

GolDDranks • today at 7:35 PM

> fetching the relevant weights from its own network

They don't have usually access to their own weights?

➕ show 1 reply
galaxyLogic • today at 7:25 PM

So it's like a smaller LLM can learn from a bigger one, but not vice versa.

But shouldn't the model-providers be the ones doing this kind of "post training learning"?

➕ show 1 reply