It's not impossible that the separate agreement in question imposes light limitations.
I think one of the initial reasons why otherwise open source models started with the limitations on model-as-a-service use cases was because of quantised or entirely different models being served as the model in question on open router, and they needed a legal method to limit that. It might just be that, thought it might also be the direct opposite, hard to know.
> It's not impossible that the separate agreement in question imposes light limitations.
It's not impossible a priori but a posteriori it's not the case, unfortunately.
Source: We've been wanting to host Kimi K3.x at work (and serve it to our clients) and got in touch with Moonshot but couldn't arrive at an agreement.