logoalt Hacker News

7734128 • yesterday at 7:15 PM • 1 reply • view on HN

It's not impossible that the separate agreement in question imposes light limitations.

I think one of the initial reasons why otherwise open source models started with the limitations on model-as-a-service use cases was because of quantised or entirely different models being served as the model in question on open router, and they needed a legal method to limit that. It might just be that, thought it might also be the direct opposite, hard to know.


Replies

codethief • today at 3:56 PM

> It's not impossible that the separate agreement in question imposes light limitations.

It's not impossible a priori but a posteriori it's not the case, unfortunately.

Source: We've been wanting to host Kimi K3.x at work (and serve it to our clients) and got in touch with Moonshot but couldn't arrive at an agreement.