logoalt Hacker News

FabHK • today at 3:28 AM • 6 replies • view on HN

Correction: Most US companies have policies that strongly discourage this, or forbid it.

In Europe, workplace relationships are considered a private matter as long as workplace peace doesn't suffer, and a ban would be considered legally impermissible. Europeans manage it with disclosure requirements and reassignment, not bans.


Replies

ElProlactin • today at 4:18 AM

> ...and a ban would be considered legally impermissible.

This is factually incorrect. It is entirely legal for companies in Europe to restrict relationships where one party is a direct subordinate to the other. They can also legally require disclosure of such relationships.

This is common because these relationships can create significant conflicts of interest.

As someone else in this thread noted, the former CEO of Nestle (a Swiss company) was fired because he had a relationship with a direct report that he failed to disclose, and the former CEO of BP (a UK company) resigned because of a similar situation.

➕ show 2 replies
rhipitr • today at 3:50 AM

Isn’t it a conflict of interest to be sleeping with your direct reports? How does that play out in performance reviews? It’s definitely a massive HR problem

➕ show 3 replies
ummonk • today at 3:38 AM

How would they reassign someone from the reporting chain of the company's CEO?

➕ show 1 reply
hn_throwaway_99 • today at 3:39 AM

The CEOs of both BP and Nestle lost their jobs for having relationships with employees.

➕ show 2 replies
fsckboy • today at 4:55 AM

The US also does not allow banning relationships, but employers are not required to employ both persons in a couple. Europe restricts many aspects of people losing their jobs, is a more salient aspect of the legal comparison.

➕ show 1 reply
abletonlive • today at 3:40 AM

[flagged]