logoalt Hacker News

RIMRyesterday at 3:50 PM4 repliesview on HN

It should not be legal to enforce this kind of thing 9 years after a person leaves your company. I get that it currently is legal, but have some principles. Just because this is legal doesn't mean it isn't morally reprehensible, and its legality should be challenged.


Replies

pwdisswordfishyyesterday at 4:33 PM

It should not be legal to enforce full stop. If you don't want to be disparaged, make your conduct worthy of not being disparaged. When you're being lied about, sue for defamation; "non-disparagement clauses" are redundant at best, an attack on free speech at worst.

show 2 replies
prependyesterday at 7:21 PM

She didn’t have to agree to the contract. I don’t really want some arbitrary govt limit restricting what private parties can do with each other.

show 4 replies
jeffbeeyesterday at 3:57 PM

That's a ridiculous constraint to put on the freedom to enter into contracts.

show 2 replies
senecayesterday at 4:17 PM

Why would it not be legal to enforce a contract after 9 years? If she didn't want it enforced after a duration, she could have negotiated for that, or just not signed it.

I don't see how it's principled to legally swear to not do something, then turn around and do it anyways. She's an adult, she has agency, and she chose to enter that contract.

It's also not like we're talking about a legal whistleblower here. That act DOES (and should) have a lot of legal protections. This is someone writing a book that they personally profit from.

show 5 replies